Is Kurt Warner's success only a product of great receivers? - great receivers
In St. Louis had Isaac Bruce and Torry Holt and Marshall Faulk, probably the greatest RB in the reception history of the NFL.
In Arizona, Fitz and Boldin are the best recording duo in the league and also made the Pro Bowl last season. Not to mention the fact that it is awful, New York, where he did not receive the best place to mention in the league.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Great Receivers Is Kurt Warner's Success Only A Product Of Great Receivers?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Good quarterbacks and receivers are well placed to do well good receiver. Kurt Warner is a great quarterback. If you remember, Tom Brady has had an incredible season, the year in Randy Moss. If you have a good quarter, good receivers have, but no, it's not good. That is why the Bears have a good receiver is preserved. If you have a good receiver, but not a good quarter, it is not good because they throw anyone, to have them. Both the receivers and quarterbacks need to work together and make each other well. Help for a quarterback, sound receiver a great help, and for the receiver to a good quarter.
I wouldnt say a product of their receptors, they are a tandem.
It is a success, but he saw Matt Liénart did when it started in Arizona and it was not so great.
Take, for example, did Tom Brady take a while, two years ago with Moss. The following season, injuries, Cassell took over the situation almost exactly the same, even if there is an effective number of those who do not even come close to Brady.
No, and Boldin is overrated. In addition to QB receiversmore than vice versa,
Warner only had problems because he had the injury a few years.
Look at Brett Favre. He's got his whole career without the exception of two years, with Sharpe. Nevertheless, broke all records. Of course, Favre could throw a football as anyone who has ever lived, but still!
always good to have receptors, but the same could be from Peyton Manning or Steve Young. Quarterback can possess any talented receiver, but I bet if a man like Ryan Leaf (find out) was Randy Moss, Larry Fitzgerald, Marvin Harrison, Terrell Owens and Chad Johnson not produce to his person in the situation. Kurt Warner is a good QB of all recipients of the stars that you do a lot better
It was horrible New York has 2 bad games and the Giants had decided to open the boy, has been paid, 15 million euros per year. Nobody knew who he was when Fitz Leinhart was the quarterback. Warner is a great quarterback and MVP of the league for a reason. What the Rams without him? Like the Super Bowl Cardinals prior to works about Warner? How about even a playoff game? Warner is the real deal.
How well do if Josh McCown was the Cardinals, and the quarterback Matt Leinart with Fitzgerald and Boldin?
Just in New York is terrible. It was a rating of 86.5 and they won five of the first seven games. He was replaced by Eli Manning. Manning was really awful for the rest of the season.
No, I currently think so .. although he played duets with some major beneficiaries .. He was 3-for talented receiver az Zahir Hakim (his best) and Steve Breaston .. However, the beneficiaries can not make games if the ball is done on time and in a position to something after the catch, and it comes into play Warner. it is the last pocket passer, which is based on timing and accuracy with their receivers ..
After the guys certainly helps, but I think he finally made it to New York if you have the chance.
Nevertheless, irregular, sometimes take longer for the most players in the league.
This is a factor, but if it is the only receiver, and quarterback Matt Leinart would statting for the Arizona Cardinals.
Post a Comment